'Make It Pop' Had a Cousin, and It Almost Made Me Quit
Photo: Individual designer not identified. Copyright holder and requested attribution: Clard Amol Co. — Mahsun (شرکت کلرد آمل — مهسان)., CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Three years ago, a client looked at a brand identity I'd spent six weeks on, smiled politely, and said: "It's great. It just needs... more personality."
I nodded. I took notes. I went home and stared at my ceiling for a long time.
More personality. What does that even mean? The work had personality. I had personality. Was the problem the color palette? The typeface? Was it me? Was I the personality deficit?
If you've worked in any creative field in the US for more than a minute, you've gotten this exact feedback, or one of its siblings: "Make it pop." "It needs to feel more premium." "Something's missing, I just can't put my finger on it."
Here's what nobody tells you: this feedback isn't useless. It's just encrypted. And once you crack the code, vague notes become the most valuable thing a client can give you.
What 'More Personality' Actually Meant
I got lucky. Instead of quietly redoing everything and hoping for the best, I scheduled a 20-minute call and asked the only question that mattered: "Can you show me two brands — any brands, doesn't matter the industry — that feel like they have the personality you're looking for?"
The client sent over three examples within an hour. And here's the kicker: they were all warmer than what I'd delivered. Rounder type. More conversational copy. One had an illustrated mascot. Nothing edgy, nothing bold — the thing I'd assumed "personality" meant.
I had given them sophisticated. They wanted friendly. Those are different words, and I had never once used the word "friendly" in our kickoff questionnaire.
That was the whole gap. Six weeks of work, and the fix was a single adjective nobody had said out loud.
The Real Problem: Clients Describe Feelings, Not Specs
Here's the thing I finally understood: most clients aren't trained in design vocabulary, and why would they be? That's what they hired me for. When they say "personality," they're reaching for the only word available to describe a feeling they can't name yet.
So I stopped treating vague feedback as a mystery and started treating it like a translation exercise. My rough dictionary, built one project at a time:
- "More personality" usually means: the work is competent but generic. It could belong to anyone. They want something only they could own.
- "Make it pop" usually means: there's no clear hierarchy. Everything is shouting at the same volume, so nothing lands.
- "It feels too corporate" usually means: the work resembles something that hurt them before — a past employer, a bank, a bad agency experience.
- "Something feels off, I can't say what" usually means: one element contradicts the rest. A playful headline in a stiff typeface. A luxe photo next to a discount-store CTA.
- "Can we see more options?" usually means: they don't trust their own taste yet and need help articulating a preference, not more work.
None of these are insults. They're all requests for a shared vocabulary.
The Two-Question Fix
After that project, I built a tiny ritual into every feedback round. Two questions, asked in this order:
- "What's the feeling you're not getting yet?" — not what's wrong, but what's missing. Wrongness makes people defensive; absence makes them honest.
- "Who does this well, in your eyes?" — outside the industry if possible. Reference points turn adjectives into decisions.
That's it. It takes five minutes and has saved me probably hundreds of revision hours. Once a client says "I want it to feel like a dinner party, not a boardroom," I know exactly which levers to pull. Warm palette, human-scale photography, copy that says "we" instead of "solutions."
The reverse works too. When I present work, I never say "I went with a friendly tone." I say "This reads like a neighbor recommending a restaurant, not a brand issuing a press release." Same vocabulary the client already uses. No translation required on their end.
The Feedback Isn't About the Work (Usually)
One more thing I learned the hard way: sometimes "more personality" has nothing to do with the design. Sometimes the client means they don't feel visible in it yet. They looked at the work and couldn't find themselves, so they assumed the work was the problem.
The fix there isn't another round of revisions. It's a conversation about who they are when nobody's grading them — the story they tell at barbecues about what they do. I've pulled some of my best creative direction from those barbecue stories. Real personality lives there, not in brand archetype worksheets.
Say the Quiet Adjective Out Loud
These days, I treat every piece of vague feedback as a flag that somewhere in the kickoff, an adjective went unsaid. My intake forms now literally ask: "If your brand were a person at a party, what are they doing?" It sounds gimmicky. Clients answer it in detail, every time, and it's worth ten rounds of "make it pop."
The client who asked for more personality didn't set me back. They taught me the single most useful skill in a creative career: hearing what people mean instead of what they say. And honestly, that skill has improved every relationship in my life — not just the ones with invoices attached.